Context effects and models of preferential choice: implications for consumer behavior
نویسندگان
چکیده
The article summarizes extant research on context effects and choice theories in a straightforward fashion. The context effects are used as benchmarks to compare six choice theories. The context effects include similarity, attraction, compromise, and reference point effects. The considered theories include simple scalability model, random utility model, elimination by aspects model, strategy switching models, componential context model, and connectionist network model of choice. The article discusses the implications of each model for consumer behavior, and suggests that the choice of model should depend on the characteristics of products, consumers and purchase process.
منابع مشابه
Context Effects in Inference 1 RUNNING HEAD: Multi-alternative Context Effects Obtained Using an Inference Task Multi-alternative Context Effects Obtained Using an Inference Task
When decision-makers are faced with a choice among multiple options that have several attributes, preferences are often influenced by how the options are related to one another. For example, consumer preferences can be influenced and even reversed by the context defined by available products. This paper discusses three standard context effects found in the preferential choice literature: the at...
متن کاملURAL E CONOMY Choice Environment , Market Complexity and Consumer Behavior : A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice
Most empirical models of consumer choice assume that the decision-maker assesses all alternatives and information in a perfect information processing sense. The complexity of the choice environment, the ability of the individual to make complex decisions and the effect of choice context on the decision strategy, are generally not considered in statistical model development. One of the reasons f...
متن کاملRigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.
Cognitive models of decision making aim to explain the process underlying observed choices. Here, we test a sequential sampling model of decision making, multialternative decision field theory (MDFT; Roe, Busemeyer, & Townsend, 2001), on empirical grounds and compare it against 2 established random utility models of choice: the probit and the logit model. Using a within-subject experimental des...
متن کاملAlternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect in Multiattribute Logit Choice Models
The compromise effect denotes the finding that brands gain share when they become the intermediate rather than an extreme option in a choice set (Simonson 1989). Despite the robustness and importance of this phenomenon, choice modelers have neglected to incorporate the compromise effect within formal choice models and to test whether such models outperform the standard value maximization model....
متن کاملHedonic Pricing under Uncertainty: A Theoretical Consumer Behavior Model
A model of consumer behavior has been formulated by using an additive utility function and the hedonic pricing approach, in a virtual market. Since, there is a time lag between ordering and purchasing products (goods and services) online and receiving them, it means the consumer makes decision under uncertainty. The level of satisfaction with products with distinctive characteristics is describ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007